
You're Probably Leaving Money on the Table as a Liquidity Provider
Most LPs focus on one question: which pool should I deposit into?
Category
How AMMs, liquidity pools, staking, and bridges move value between protocols and chains, and what that means for traders and liquidity providers.
9 articles

Most LPs focus on one question: which pool should I deposit into?

Most LPs pick a fee tier by vibes, then wonder why a busy-looking position earns almost nothing.

You want to trade Token A for Token C. Simple enough. Except there's no pool that holds both of them.

Most people lose money in the first thirty seconds of a trade, before price even moves against them. They lose it to the spread, to the slippage, to the quiet gap between what they thought they were buying and what the market actually handed them. The culprit is almost never the chart.…

Picture a traveler standing at a border with a suitcase full of currency nobody on the other side will accept. They could find a money changer, pay a fee, wait in line, and hope the rate is fair. Or they could stay home. For years, this was the daily reality of moving value between blockchains.…

For most of crypto's short history, decentralized trading had a dirty secret.

Most people pick one of these before they understand what they actually signed up for. They see two numbers, an APY on a staking page and a bigger APY on a liquidity pool, pick the bigger one, and assume math is on their side.…

Every time you hit "swap," a smart contract silently reprices a market in real time: no order book, no counterparty, no bid waiting to be matched. Just math. And most people using DeFi daily couldn't tell you what that math is.

Here is the framing you will find in almost every explainer on this topic: AMMs are simple but inefficient, order books are complex but precise. Pick your poison.